[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] pl031 time across vm save/reload
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] pl031 time across vm save/reload |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jul 2019 12:13:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 |
On 05/07/19 11:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 10:48, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> You're right, the compatibility causes wrong behavior for the default
>> -rtc settings (the RC pauses across migration). The right thing to do
>> would be to store the base rather than the offset: that is, you store
>> the time at which LR was written. Then the offset is s->lr - s->base
>> and it's independent of the machine on which the rtc_clock is being read.
>
> Right. How do we handle this for back-compat purposes? I guess
> we need to have a new migration subsection, so if it's present
> it has the 'base' value and we ignore the 'offset' in the
> main migration data, and if it's not present we assume an
> old->new migration and use the existing offset code. New->old
> migration would not be possible as the new subsection is
> always-present.
Yes, something like that but I would just bump the version. Version 1
has the old meaning for the first field, version 2 has the new meaning.
And also, since our brains are fresh on pl031... currently s->lr is
always 0; besides the bug that writing RTC_LR should update it, the
datasheet says the counter counts up from 1 so perhaps at startup s->lr
should be set to a nonzero value? That would be
qemu_ref_timedate(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) - 1.
Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] pl031 time across vm save/reload, Peter Maydell, 2019/07/05
Re: [Qemu-devel] pl031 time across vm save/reload, Peter Maydell, 2019/07/08