[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pcie: work around for racy guest init
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pcie: work around for racy guest init |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:04:02 +0200 |
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 05:20:41 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:07:30PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 02:46:50 -0400
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > During boot, linux guests tend to clear all bits in pcie slot status
> > > register which is used for hotplug.
> > > If they clear bits that weren't set this is racy and will lose events:
> > > not a big problem for manual hotplug on bare-metal, but a problem for us.
> > >
> > > For example, the following is broken ATM:
> > >
> > > /x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -S -machine q35 \
> > > -device
> > > pcie-root-port,id=pcie_root_port_0,slot=2,chassis=2,addr=0x2,bus=pcie.0 \
> > > -device virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon,bus=pcie_root_port_0 \
> > > -monitor stdio disk.qcow2
> > > (qemu)device_del balloon
> > > (qemu)cont
> > >
> > > Balloon isn't deleted as it should.
> > >
> > > As a work-around, detect this attempt to clear slot status and revert
> > > status to what it was before the write.
> > >
> > > Note: in theory this can be detected as a duplicate button press
> > > which cancels the previous press. Does not seem to happen in
> > > practice as guests seem to only have this bug during init.
> > >
> > > Note2: the right thing to do is probably to fix Linux to
> > > read status before clearing it, and act on the bits that are set.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > hw/pci/pcie.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > index f8490a00de..c605d32dd4 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > @@ -610,6 +610,25 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_write_config(PCIDevice *dev,
> > > uint16_t slt_ctl, uint16_t slt_s
> > > uint16_t sltsta = pci_get_word(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA);
> > >
> > > if (ranges_overlap(addr, len, pos + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, 2)) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Guests tend to clears all bits during init.
> > > + * If they clear bits that weren't set this is racy and will
> > > lose events:
> > > + * not a big problem for manual button presses, but a problem
> > > for us.
> > > + * As a work-around, detect this and revert status to what it was
> > > + * before the write.
> > > + *
> > > + * Note: in theory this can be detected as a duplicate button
> > > press
> > > + * which cancels the previous press. Does not seem to happen in
> > > + * practice as guests seem to only have this bug during init.
> > > + */
> > > +#define PCIE_SLOT_EVENTS (PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_ABP | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PFD | \
> > > + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_MRLSC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC | \
> > > + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC)
> > > +
> > > + if (val & ~slt_sta & PCIE_SLOT_EVENTS) {
> > > + sltsta = (sltsta & ~PCIE_SLOT_EVENTS) | (slt_sta &
> > > PCIE_SLOT_EVENTS);
> > I'm reading it as:
> > sltsta = LOWER_PART(sltsta) | UPPER_PART(sltsta)
> > which basically
> > sltsta = sltsta
> > or am I missing something here?
>
> You are missing the underscore.
>
> slt_sta is the old value.
> sltsta is the new value.
I did notice it but still don't see where
exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA
is being modified in call chain between
pcie_cap_slot_get(d, &slt_ctl, &slt_sta)
...
pcie_cap_slot_write_config():
sltsta = pci_get_word(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA)
>
> > > + pci_set_word(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, sltsta);
> > > + }
> > > hotplug_event_clear(dev);
> > > }
> > >
>