qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 24/44] spapr: Fix phb_placement backwards compatibili


From: David Gibson
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 24/44] spapr: Fix phb_placement backwards compatibility
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 16:49:57 +1000

When we added support for NVLink2 passthrough devices, we changed the
phb_placement hook to handle the placement of NVLink2 bridges' specific
resources.  For compatibility we use a version that doesn't do this
allocation  for old machine types.

However, because of the delay between when the patch was posted and when
it was merged, we ended up with that compatibility hook applying for
machine versions 3.1 and earlier whereas it should apply for 4.0 and
earlier (since the patch was applied early in the 4.1 tree).

Fixes: ec132efaa81 "spapr: Support NVIDIA V100 GPU with NVLink2"

Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
---
 hw/ppc/spapr.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index bcae30ad26..39e698e9b0 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -4411,18 +4411,7 @@ DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(4_1, "4.1", true);
 /*
  * pseries-4.0
  */
-static void spapr_machine_4_0_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
-{
-    spapr_machine_4_1_class_options(mc);
-    compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_4_0, hw_compat_4_0_len);
-}
-
-DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(4_0, "4.0", false);
-
-/*
- * pseries-3.1
- */
-static void phb_placement_3_1(SpaprMachineState *spapr, uint32_t index,
+static void phb_placement_4_0(SpaprMachineState *spapr, uint32_t index,
                               uint64_t *buid, hwaddr *pio,
                               hwaddr *mmio32, hwaddr *mmio64,
                               unsigned n_dma, uint32_t *liobns,
@@ -4434,6 +4423,20 @@ static void phb_placement_3_1(SpaprMachineState *spapr, 
uint32_t index,
     *nv2atsd = 0;
 }
 
+static void spapr_machine_4_0_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
+{
+    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_CLASS(mc);
+
+    spapr_machine_4_1_class_options(mc);
+    compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_4_0, hw_compat_4_0_len);
+    smc->phb_placement = phb_placement_4_0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(4_0, "4.0", false);
+
+/*
+ * pseries-3.1
+ */
 static void spapr_machine_3_1_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
 {
     SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_CLASS(mc);
@@ -4449,7 +4452,6 @@ static void spapr_machine_3_1_class_options(MachineClass 
*mc)
     smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_SBBC] = SPAPR_CAP_BROKEN;
     smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_IBS] = SPAPR_CAP_BROKEN;
     smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_LARGE_DECREMENTER] = SPAPR_CAP_OFF;
-    smc->phb_placement = phb_placement_3_1;
 }
 
 DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(3_1, "3.1", false);
-- 
2.21.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]