[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 5
From: |
Yu Zhang |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width. |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:05:39 +0800 |
A 5-level paging capable VM may choose to use 57-bit IOVA address width.
E.g. guest applications may prefer to use its VA as IOVA when performing
VFIO map/unmap operations, to avoid the burden of managing the IOVA space.
This patch extends the current vIOMMU logic to cover the extended address
width. When creating a VM with 5-level paging feature, one can choose to
create a virtual VTD with 5-level paging capability, with configurations
like "-device intel-iommu,x-aw-bits=57".
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
---
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
Cc: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
Cc: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
---
hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 10 ++++++--
include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index 0e88c63..871110c 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -664,16 +664,16 @@ static inline bool vtd_iova_range_check(uint64_t iova,
VTDContextEntry *ce,
/*
* Rsvd field masks for spte:
- * Index [1] to [4] 4k pages
- * Index [5] to [8] large pages
+ * Index [1] to [5] 4k pages
+ * Index [6] to [10] large pages
*/
-static uint64_t vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[9];
+static uint64_t vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[11];
static bool vtd_slpte_nonzero_rsvd(uint64_t slpte, uint32_t level)
{
if (slpte & VTD_SL_PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK) {
/* Maybe large page */
- return slpte & vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[level + 4];
+ return slpte & vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[level + 5];
} else {
return slpte & vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[level];
}
@@ -3127,6 +3127,8 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
VTD_CAP_SAGAW_39bit | VTD_CAP_MGAW(s->aw_bits);
if (s->aw_bits == VTD_AW_48BIT) {
s->cap |= VTD_CAP_SAGAW_48bit;
+ } else if (s->aw_bits == VTD_AW_57BIT) {
+ s->cap |= VTD_CAP_SAGAW_57bit | VTD_CAP_SAGAW_48bit;
}
s->ecap = VTD_ECAP_QI | VTD_ECAP_IRO;
s->haw_bits = cpu->phys_bits;
@@ -3139,10 +3141,12 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[2] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[3] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[4] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
- vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[5] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
- vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[6] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
- vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[7] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
- vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[8] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
+ vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[5] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L5_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
+ vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[6] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
+ vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[7] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
+ vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[8] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
+ vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[9] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
+ vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[10] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L5_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
if (x86_iommu->intr_supported) {
s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_IR | VTD_ECAP_MHMV;
@@ -3241,6 +3245,23 @@ static AddressSpace *vtd_host_dma_iommu(PCIBus *bus,
void *opaque, int devfn)
return &vtd_as->as;
}
+static bool host_has_la57(void)
+{
+ uint32_t ecx, unused;
+
+ host_cpuid(7, 0, &unused, &unused, &ecx, &unused);
+ return ecx & CPUID_7_0_ECX_LA57;
+}
+
+static bool guest_has_la57(void)
+{
+ CPUState *cs = first_cpu;
+ X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
+ CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
+
+ return env->features[FEAT_7_0_ECX] & CPUID_7_0_ECX_LA57;
+}
+
static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error **errp)
{
X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s);
@@ -3267,11 +3288,19 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error
**errp)
}
}
- /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */
+ /* Currently address widths supported are 39, 48, and 57 bits */
if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_39BIT) &&
- (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_48BIT)) {
- error_setg(errp, "Supported values for x-aw-bits are: %d, %d",
- VTD_AW_39BIT, VTD_AW_48BIT);
+ (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_48BIT) &&
+ (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_57BIT)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "Supported values for x-aw-bits are: %d, %d, %d",
+ VTD_AW_39BIT, VTD_AW_48BIT, VTD_AW_57BIT);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if ((s->aw_bits == VTD_AW_57BIT) &&
+ !(host_has_la57() && guest_has_la57())) {
+ error_setg(errp, "Do not support 57-bit DMA address, unless both "
+ "host and guest are capable of 5-level paging");
return false;
}
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
index d084099..2b29b6f 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@
VTD_INTERRUPT_ADDR_FIRST + 1)
/* The shift of source_id in the key of IOTLB hash table */
-#define VTD_IOTLB_SID_SHIFT 36
-#define VTD_IOTLB_LVL_SHIFT 52
+#define VTD_IOTLB_SID_SHIFT 45
+#define VTD_IOTLB_LVL_SHIFT 61
#define VTD_IOTLB_MAX_SIZE 1024 /* Max size of the hash table */
/* IOTLB_REG */
@@ -212,6 +212,8 @@
#define VTD_CAP_SAGAW_39bit (0x2ULL << VTD_CAP_SAGAW_SHIFT)
/* 48-bit AGAW, 4-level page-table */
#define VTD_CAP_SAGAW_48bit (0x4ULL << VTD_CAP_SAGAW_SHIFT)
+ /* 57-bit AGAW, 5-level page-table */
+#define VTD_CAP_SAGAW_57bit (0x8ULL << VTD_CAP_SAGAW_SHIFT)
/* IQT_REG */
#define VTD_IQT_QT(val) (((val) >> 4) & 0x7fffULL)
@@ -379,6 +381,8 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
(0x800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
#define VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
(0x880ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
+#define VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L5_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
+ (0x880ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
(0x800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
@@ -387,6 +391,8 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
(0x3ffff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
(0x880ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
+#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L5_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
+ (0x880ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
/* Information about page-selective IOTLB invalidate */
struct VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo {
diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
index 820451c..7474c4f 100644
--- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
+++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
#define DMAR_REG_SIZE 0x230
#define VTD_AW_39BIT 39
#define VTD_AW_48BIT 48
+#define VTD_AW_57BIT 57
#define VTD_ADDRESS_WIDTH VTD_AW_39BIT
#define VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) ((1ULL << (aw)) - 1)
--
1.9.1
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Igor Mammedov, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width., Eduardo Habkost, 2018/12/20
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width.,
Yu Zhang <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Igor Mammedov, 2018/12/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Yu Zhang, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width., Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/12/19