Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: fix 169

[Max Reitz]

On 2018-04-11 15:05, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:

[...]

> Hmm, first type? I'm now not sure about, did I really see sha256
> mismatch, or something like this (should be error, but found bitmap):
> 
> --- /work/src/qemu/up-169/tests/qemu-iotests/169.out    2018-04-11
> 15:35:10.055027392 +0300
> +++ /work/src/qemu/up-169/tests/qemu-iotests/169.out.bad 2018-04-11
> 15:58:09.300450045 +0300
> @@ -1,5 +1,20 @@
> -........
> +F.......
> +======================================================================
> +FAIL: test__not_persistent__migbitmap__offline
> (__main__.TestDirtyBitmapMigration)
> +methodcaller(name, ...) --> methodcaller object
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +Traceback (most recent call last):
> +  File "169", line 136, in do_test_migration
> +    self.check_bitmap(self.vm_b, sha256 if persistent else False)
> +  File "169", line 77, in check_bitmap
> +    "Dirty bitmap 'bitmap0' not found");
> +  File "/work/src/qemu/up-169/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line 389,
> in assert_qmp
> +    result = self.dictpath(d, path)
> +  File "/work/src/qemu/up-169/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line 348,
> in dictpath
> +    self.fail('failed path traversal for "%s" in "%s"' % (path, str(d)))
> +AssertionError: failed path traversal for "error/desc" in "{u'return':
> {u'sha256':
> u'01d2ebedcb8f549a2547dbf8e231c410e3e747a9479e98909fc936e0035cf8b1'}}"
> 
> 
> Max, did you really seed sha256 mismatch or only something like this?

I'm pretty sure I did see mismatches.

Max