[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:08:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
On 23/11/2017 13:59, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> I'm not sure I like that. For me, qemu-kvm comes with the connotation
>> of "there used to be a fork of qemu for kvm usage, and we stuck with
>> the name because it is likely scattered through scripts".
>
> Yes, qemu-kvm is a historical artifact in Fedora solely because of the
> previous fork.
In Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Arch Linux and NixOS at least. AFAICS only
Gentoo doesn't have it.
Looks like something that upstream should provide, let's not fight
windmills.
Paolo
We can't easily get rid of it because the path is encoded
> in libvirt XML files and countless end user scripts/configs.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Cornelia Huck, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Cornelia Huck, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Cornelia Huck, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Peter Maydell, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Peter Maydell, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23