[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] migration/ram.c: do not set 'postcopy_ru
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] migration/ram.c: do not set 'postcopy_running' in POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:27:14 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
* Daniel Henrique Barboza (address@hidden) wrote:
> When migrating a VM with 'migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on'
> a postcopy_state is set during the process, ending up with the
> state POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END when the migration is over. This
> postcopy_state is taken into account inside ram_load to check
> how it will load the memory pages. This same ram_load is called when
> in a loadvm command.
>
> Inside ram_load, the logic to see if we're at postcopy_running state
> is:
>
> postcopy_running = postcopy_state_get() >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING
>
> postcopy_state_get() returns this enum type:
>
> typedef enum {
> POSTCOPY_INCOMING_NONE = 0,
> POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE,
> POSTCOPY_INCOMING_DISCARD,
> POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING,
> POSTCOPY_INCOMING_RUNNING,
> POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END
> } PostcopyState;
>
> In the case where ram_load is executed and postcopy_state is
> POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END, postcopy_running will be set to 'true' and
> ram_load will behave like a postcopy is in progress. This scenario isn't
> achievable in a migration but it is reproducible when executing
> savevm/loadvm after migrating with 'postcopy-ram on', causing loadvm
> to fail with Error -22:
>
> Source:
>
> (qemu) migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on
> (qemu) migrate tcp:127.0.0.1:4444
>
> Dest:
>
> (qemu) migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on
> (qemu)
> ubuntu1704-intel login:
> Ubuntu 17.04 ubuntu1704-intel ttyS0
>
> ubuntu1704-intel login: (qemu)
> (qemu) savevm test1
> (qemu) loadvm test1
> Unknown combination of migration flags: 0x4 (postcopy mode)
> error while loading state for instance 0x0 of device 'ram'
> Error -22 while loading VM state
> (qemu)
>
> This patch fixes this problem by changing the existing logic for
> postcopy_advised and postcopy_running in ram_load, making them
> 'false' if we're at POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <address@hidden>
Thank you for spotting that.
As Peter says those two functions might be better elsewhere,
but they're OK there; so:
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
> ---
> migration/ram.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 8620aa400a..021d583b9b 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -2798,6 +2798,18 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static bool postcopy_is_advised(void)
> +{
> + PostcopyState ps = postcopy_state_get();
> + return ps >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE && ps < POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END;
> +}
> +
> +static bool postcopy_is_running(void)
> +{
> + PostcopyState ps = postcopy_state_get();
> + return ps >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING && ps < POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END;
> +}
> +
> static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
> {
> int flags = 0, ret = 0, invalid_flags = 0;
> @@ -2807,9 +2819,9 @@ static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int
> version_id)
> * If system is running in postcopy mode, page inserts to host memory
> must
> * be atomic
> */
> - bool postcopy_running = postcopy_state_get() >=
> POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING;
> + bool postcopy_running = postcopy_is_running();
> /* ADVISE is earlier, it shows the source has the postcopy capability on
> */
> - bool postcopy_advised = postcopy_state_get() >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE;
> + bool postcopy_advised = postcopy_is_advised();
>
> seq_iter++;
>
> --
> 2.13.6
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK