qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 10/10] test-qga: Actually test 0xff sync byte


From: Michael Roth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 10/10] test-qga: Actually test 0xff sync bytes
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 11:46:36 -0500
User-agent: alot/0.5.1

Quoting Eric Blake (2017-04-27 16:58:21)
> Commit 62c39b3 introduced test-qga, and at face value, appears
> to be testing the 'guest-sync' behavior that is recommended for
> guests in sending 0xff to QGA to force the parser to reset.  But
> this aspect of the test has never actually done anything: the
> qmp_fd() call chain converts its string argument into QObject,
> then converts that QObject back to the actual string that is
> sent over the wire - and the conversion process silently drops
> the 0xff byte from the string sent to QGA, thus never resetting
> the QGA parser.
> 
> An upcoming patch will get rid of the wasteful round trip
> through QObject, at which point the string in test-qga will be
> directly sent over the wire.
> 
> But fixing qmp_fd() to actually send 0xff over the wire is not
> all we have to do - the actual QMP parser loudly complains that
> 0xff is not valid JSON, and sends an error message _prior_ to
> actually parsing the 'guest-sync' or 'guest-sync-delimited'
> command.  With 'guest-sync', we cannot easily tell if this error
> message is a result of our command - which is WHY we invented
> the 'guest-sync-delimited' command.  So for the testsuite, fix
> things to only check 0xff behavior on 'guest-sync-delimited',
> and to loop until we've consumed all garbage prior to the
> requested delimiter, which matches the documented actions that
> a real QGA client is supposed to do.

The full re-sync sequence is actually to perform that process,
check if the response matches the client-provided sync token,
and then repeat the procedure if it doesn't (in the odd case
that a previous client initiated a guest-sync-delimited
sequence and never consumed the response). The current
implementation only performs one iteration so it's not quite
a full implementation of the documentation procedure.

For the immediate purpose of improving the handling to deal
with the 0xFF-generated error the patch seems sound though,
maybe just something worth noting in the commit msg or
comments so that we might eventually test the full procedure.

In any case:

Reviewed-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden>

> 
> Ideally, we'd fix the QGA JSON parser to silently ignore 0xff
> rather than sending an error message back, at which point we
> could enhance this test for 'guest-sync' as well as for
> 'guest-sync-delimited'.  But for the sake of this patch, our
> testing of 'guest-sync' is no worse than it was pre-patch,
> because we have never been sending 0xff over the wire in the
> first place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
> 
> ---
> v5: add R-b
> v4: no change
> v3: use inline \xff byte rather than %c, add comment
> ---
>  tests/libqtest.c |  8 ++++++++
>  tests/test-qga.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/libqtest.c b/tests/libqtest.c
> index 512c150..84ecbd2 100644
> --- a/tests/libqtest.c
> +++ b/tests/libqtest.c
> @@ -446,6 +446,14 @@ void qmp_fd_sendv(int fd, const char *fmt, va_list ap)
>      va_list ap_copy;
>      QObject *qobj;
> 
> +    /* qobject_from_jsonv() silently eats leading 0xff as invalid
> +     * JSON, but we want to test sending them over the wire to force
> +     * resyncs */
> +    if (*fmt == '\377') {
> +        socket_send(fd, fmt, 1);
> +        fmt++;
> +    }
> +
>      /* Going through qobject ensures we escape strings properly.
>       * This seemingly unnecessary copy is required in case va_list
>       * is an array type.
> diff --git a/tests/test-qga.c b/tests/test-qga.c
> index c780f00..438c2e7 100644
> --- a/tests/test-qga.c
> +++ b/tests/test-qga.c
> @@ -146,14 +146,23 @@ static void test_qga_sync_delimited(gconstpointer fix)
>      QDict *ret;
>      gchar *cmd;
> 
> -    cmd = g_strdup_printf("%c{'execute': 'guest-sync-delimited',"
> -                          " 'arguments': {'id': %u } }", 0xff, r);
> +    cmd = g_strdup_printf("\xff{'execute': 'guest-sync-delimited',"
> +                          " 'arguments': {'id': %u } }", r);
>      qmp_fd_send(fixture->fd, cmd);
>      g_free(cmd);
> 
> -    v = read(fixture->fd, &c, 1);
> -    g_assert_cmpint(v, ==, 1);
> -    g_assert_cmpint(c, ==, 0xff);
> +    /*
> +     * Read and ignore garbage until resynchronized.
> +     *
> +     * TODO: The server shouldn't emit so much garbage (among other
> +     * things, it loudly complains about the client's \xff being
> +     * invalid JSON, even though it is a documented part of the
> +     * handshake.
> +     */
> +    do {
> +        v = read(fixture->fd, &c, 1);
> +        g_assert_cmpint(v, ==, 1);
> +    } while (c != 0xff);
> 
>      ret = qmp_fd_receive(fixture->fd);
>      g_assert_nonnull(ret);
> @@ -172,8 +181,19 @@ static void test_qga_sync(gconstpointer fix)
>      QDict *ret;
>      gchar *cmd;
> 
> -    cmd = g_strdup_printf("%c{'execute': 'guest-sync',"
> -                          " 'arguments': {'id': %u } }", 0xff, r);
> +    /*
> +     * TODO guest-sync is inherently limited: we cannot distinguish
> +     * failure caused by reacting to garbage on the wire prior to this
> +     * command, from failure of this actual command. Clients are
> +     * supposed to be able to send a raw '\xff' byte to at least
> +     * re-synchronize the server's parser prior to this command, but
> +     * we are not in a position to test that here because (at least
> +     * for now) it causes the server to issue an error message about
> +     * invalid JSON. Testing of '\xff' handling is done in
> +     * guest-sync-delimited instead.
> +     */
> +    cmd = g_strdup_printf("{'execute': 'guest-sync',"
> +                          " 'arguments': {'id': %u } }", r);
>      ret = qmp_fd(fixture->fd, cmd);
>      g_free(cmd);
> 
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]