[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:54:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Am 04.04.2017 um 15:27 hat Peter Krempa geschrieben:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 15:19:02 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 03.04.2017 um 14:51 hat Peter Krempa geschrieben:
> > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:15:42 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > Am 31.03.2017 um 19:43 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> > > > > On 31.03.2017 18:03, Ciprian Barbu wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > Peter, Eric, what is the status on the libvirt side here?
> > >
> > > Libvirt currently uses the NBD server only for non-shared storage
> > > migration. At that point the disk is not shared (while qemu may think
> > > so) since the other side is not actually running until the mirror
> > > reaches synchronized state.
> >
> > Yes, I misunderstood the situation at first.
> >
> > Anyway, is there already a libvirt patch for the cases where the image
> > is actually shared?
>
> As said, we use the nbd server only for migration. There's no other
> usage I know of and thus no patch.
I mean two VMs sharing the same image file, and both expose it as a
guest device. The situation for which we discussed before that libvirt
needs to pass share-rw=on. I understand that this isn't related to this
report, but I want to make sure that it's not forgotten.
Kevin
pgp_MxFnd7u3H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Eric Blake, 2017/04/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Peter Krempa, 2017/04/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kashyap Chamarthy, 2017/04/03