[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 15/17] vfio/pci: Remove vfio_msix_early_setup
From: |
Auger Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 15/17] vfio/pci: Remove vfio_msix_early_setup returned value |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Oct 2016 18:09:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
Hi Markus,
On 04/10/2016 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Auger <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> The returned value is not used anymore by the caller, vfio_realize,
>> since the error now is stored in the error object. So let's remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Logically we could do that job for all the functions now getting an
>> Error object passed as a parameter to avoid duplicate information
>> between the error content and the returned value. This requires to use
>> a local error object in vfio_realize. So I am not sure this is worth
>> the candle.
>
> Matter of taste, yours is fine.
>
> We used to recommend returing void instead of an error code when the
> function sets and error. More parsimonious in theory, more boiler-plate
> in practice, so we accept either now. Perhaps we should even recommend
> returning an error code, but such a recommendation needs to come with
> patches converting existing code to it.
The risk is that if a programmer returns an error value without setting
the errp he will get a sigsev on subsequent error_prepend().
>
>> ---
>> hw/vfio/pci.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
>> index b316e13..cea4d48 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
>> @@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_fixup_msix_region(VFIOPCIDevice
>> *vdev)
>> * need to first look for where the MSI-X table lives. So we
>> * unfortunately split MSI-X setup across two functions.
>> */
>> -static int vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
>> +static void vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
>> {
>> uint8_t pos;
>> uint16_t ctrl;
>> @@ -1300,25 +1300,25 @@ static int vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice
>> *vdev, Error **errp)
>>
>> pos = pci_find_capability(&vdev->pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
>> if (!pos) {
>> - return 0;
>> + return;
>> }
>>
>> if (pread(fd, &ctrl, sizeof(ctrl),
>> vdev->config_offset + pos + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS) != sizeof(ctrl)) {
>> error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "failed to read PCI MSIX FLAGS");
>> - return -errno;
>> + return;
>> }
>>
>> if (pread(fd, &table, sizeof(table),
>> vdev->config_offset + pos + PCI_MSIX_TABLE) != sizeof(table))
>> {
>> error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "failed to read PCI MSIX TABLE");
>> - return -errno;
>> + return;
>> }
>>
>> if (pread(fd, &pba, sizeof(pba),
>> vdev->config_offset + pos + PCI_MSIX_PBA) != sizeof(pba)) {
>> error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "failed to read PCI MSIX PBA");
>> - return -errno;
>> + return;
>> }
>>
>> ctrl = le16_to_cpu(ctrl);
>> @@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ static int vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev,
>> Error **errp)
>> error_setg(errp, "hardware reports invalid configuration, "
>> "MSIX PBA outside of specified BAR");
>> g_free(msix);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + return;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1360,8 +1360,6 @@ static int vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev,
>> Error **errp)
>> vdev->msix = msix;
>>
>> vfio_pci_fixup_msix_region(vdev);
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int vfio_msix_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, int pos, Error **errp)
>> @@ -2519,6 +2517,7 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
>> VFIODevice *vbasedev_iter;
>> VFIOGroup *group;
>> char *tmp, group_path[PATH_MAX], *group_name;
>> + Error *err = NULL;
>> ssize_t len;
>> struct stat st;
>> int groupid;
>> @@ -2670,8 +2669,9 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
>>
>> vfio_pci_size_rom(vdev);
>>
>> - ret = vfio_msix_early_setup(vdev, errp);
>> - if (ret) {
>> + vfio_msix_early_setup(vdev, &err);
>> + if (err) {
>> + error_propagate(errp, err);
>> goto error;
>> }
>
> PATCH 04 checks err, PATCH 13 flips to ret, and this one flips back.
> Have you considered dropping both flips? Your choice.
I removed one flip at least
Thanks
Eric
>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 08/17] vfio: Pass an Error object to vfio_connect_container, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 06/17] vfio/pci: Pass an error object to vfio_add_capabilities, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 09/17] vfio: Pass an error object to vfio_get_group, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 10/17] vfio: Pass an error object to vfio_get_device, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/17] vfio/platform: Pass an error object to vfio_populate_device, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 12/17] vfio/platform: fix a wrong returned value in vfio_populate_device, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 15/17] vfio/pci: Remove vfio_msix_early_setup returned value, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/17] vfio/pci: Conversion to realize, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 16/17] vfio/pci: Remove vfio_populate_device returned value, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 13/17] vfio/platform: Pass an error object to vfio_base_device_init, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 17/17] vfio/pci: Handle host oversight, Eric Auger, 2016/10/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/17] Convert VFIO-PCI to realize, Markus Armbruster, 2016/10/04