qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/30] qmp-commands: move 'query-migrate-paramet


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/30] qmp-commands: move 'query-migrate-parameters' doc to schema
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:40:33 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 09/13/2016 08:01 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> >  docs/qmp-commands.txt | 29 -----------------------------
>> >  qapi-schema.json      | 13 +++++++++++++
>> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> 
>> > +++ b/qapi-schema.json
>> > @@ -1011,6 +1011,19 @@
>> >  # Returns: @MigrationParameters
>> >  #
>> >  # Since: 2.4
>> > +#
>> > +# Example:
>> > +#
>> > +# -> { "execute": "query-migrate-parameters" }
>> > +# <- { "return": {
>> > +#          "decompress-threads": 2,
>> > +#          "cpu-throttle-increment": 10,
>> > +#          "compress-threads": 8,
>> > +#          "compress-level": 1,
>> > +#          "cpu-throttle-initial": 20
>> > +#       }
>> > +#    }
>> > +#
>> >  ##
>> >  { 'command': 'query-migrate-parameters',
>> >    'returns': 'MigrationParameters' }
>> 
>> The example lacks 'cpu-throttle-increment', 'tls-creds', and
>> 'tls-hostname'; do we want to take this opportunity to touch it up?
>
> I suggest to put a [...] in the returned example, as this example could grow 
> again, and there isn't much to learn from that query.
>  
>> Meanwhile, I have a series that touches this code, and will obviously
>> create a merge conflict for whoever gets in second:
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-09/msg01946.html
>
> Yes, the more we wait to review the series, the more conflicts we will get. 
> There is still over 100 patches to go, I'll send the next 30.

We suggested restructuring the series, and you liked the idea with the
alternative step (3b), not (3a).  Would it make sense to repost the
beginning of the multi-part monster in that form before moving on to the
next part?

[...]



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]