qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/5] linux-user: Fix structure target_flock d


From: Aleksandar Markovic
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/5] linux-user: Fix structure target_flock definition for Mips
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:20:36 +0000

You are correct. This is going to be fixed in v6, which will appear soon.

Thanks!

Aleksandar
________________________________________
From: Leon Alrae
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 2:51 AM
To: Aleksandar Markovic
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; Petar 
Jovanovic; Miodrag Dinic; Aleksandar Rikalo; Aleksandar Markovic
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] linux-user: Fix structure target_flock definition 
for Mips

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:40:02PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> From: Aleksandar Markovic <address@hidden>
>
> Structure flock is defined for Mips in a way different from any
> other platform. For reference, see Linux kernel source code files:
>
> arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/fcntl.h#L63 (for Mips)
> include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h#L195 (for all other platforms)
>
> This patch fix this problem, by amending structure target_flock,
> for Mips only.
>
> Besides, this patch fixes LTP tests fcntl11, fcntl17, fcntl19, fcntl20,
> and fcntl21, which are currently failing, if executed in Qemu user mode
> for Mips platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Markovic <address@hidden>
> ---
>  linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> index 44b1197..c40b725 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> @@ -2327,7 +2327,13 @@ struct target_flock {
>      short l_whence;
>      abi_long l_start;
>      abi_long l_len;
> +#if defined(TARGET_MIPS)
> +    target_long l_sysid;

In n32 ABI this will have incorrect size. This should be abi_long.

> +#endif
>      int l_pid;
> +#if defined(TARGET_MIPS)
> +    target_long pad[4];

Same.

Otherwise the series looks good to me.

Thanks,
Leon


> +#endif
>  };
>
>  struct target_flock64 {
> --
> 2.9.3
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]