[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qom: Use atomics for object refcounting
From: |
Andreas Färber |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qom: Use atomics for object refcounting |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:15:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Am 02.07.2013 11:36, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> Objects can soon be referenced/dereference outside the BQL. So we need
> to use atomics in object_ref/unref.
>
> Based on patch by Liu Ping Fan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
> ---
> qom/object.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> index 803b94b..a76a30b 100644
> --- a/qom/object.c
> +++ b/qom/object.c
> @@ -683,16 +683,15 @@ GSList *object_class_get_list(const char
> *implements_type,
>
> void object_ref(Object *obj)
> {
> - obj->ref++;
> + __sync_fetch_and_add(&obj->ref, 1);
How widespread are these in GCC/clang? Is there any fallback? I remember
seeing some __sync_* warnings on Mac OS X around 4.2...
Andreas
> }
>
> void object_unref(Object *obj)
> {
> g_assert(obj->ref > 0);
> - obj->ref--;
>
> /* parent always holds a reference to its children */
> - if (obj->ref == 0) {
> + if (__sync_sub_and_fetch(&obj->ref, 1) == 0) {
> object_finalize(obj);
> }
> }
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qom: Use atomics for object refcounting, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/02