[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory sem
From: |
Marcelo Tosatti |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:28:02 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:46:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> do we need some KVM knob comparable to qemu-kvm's -kvm-shadow-memory in
> upstream?
>
> If yes: The underlying IOCTL is x86-only. Are other archs interested in
> this long-term as well, ie. should the control become arch-independent?
>
> Jan
Last time i asked about removal, Avi wished for it to remain.
- [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Alexander Graf, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?,
Marcelo Tosatti <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Avi Kivity, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Avi Kivity, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Avi Kivity, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Avi Kivity, 2012/01/25