[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory sem
From: |
Alexander Graf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:24:32 +0100 |
On 19.01.2012, at 13:46, Jan Kiszka <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> do we need some KVM knob comparable to qemu-kvm's -kvm-shadow-memory in
> upstream?
What does it do? Never heard of it :)
Alex
>
> If yes: The underlying IOCTL is x86-only. Are other archs interested in
> this long-term as well, ie. should the control become arch-independent?
>
> Jan
>
> --
> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
>
- [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?,
Alexander Graf <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Marcelo Tosatti, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Avi Kivity, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Avi Kivity, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Avi Kivity, 2012/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?, Jan Kiszka, 2012/01/25