qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] Use the correct mask to size the PCI option


From: Gleb Natapov
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] Use the correct mask to size the PCI option ROM BAR.
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:50:24 +0200

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:53:56PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 08:59:05PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Bit 0 is the enable bit, which we not only don't want to set, but
> > it will stick and make us think it's an I/O port resource.
> > 
> > Qemu pcbios commit 6ddb9f5c742b2b82b1755d7ec2a127f6e20e3806
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  src/pciinit.c |    8 +++++---
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/pciinit.c b/src/pciinit.c
> > index 1d0f784..29b3901 100644
> > --- a/src/pciinit.c
> > +++ b/src/pciinit.c
> > @@ -139,11 +139,13 @@ static void pci_bios_init_device(u16 bdf)
> >              int ofs;
> >              u32 val, size;
> >  
> > -            if (i == PCI_ROM_SLOT)
> > +            if (i == PCI_ROM_SLOT) {
> >                  ofs = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS;
> > -            else
> > +                pci_config_writel(bdf, ofs, 0xfffffffe);
> > +            } else {
> >                  ofs = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + i * 4;
> > -            pci_config_writel(bdf, ofs, 0xffffffff);
> > +                pci_config_writel(bdf, ofs, 0xffffffff);
> > +            }
> >              val = pci_config_readl(bdf, ofs);
> >              if (val != 0) {
> >                  size = (~(val & ~0xf)) + 1;
> 
> Hmm, eithe rinterpreet the spec strictly or loosely.
> 
> If you implement the spec loosely, you can just write 
> 0xfffffffe unconditionally: low bit is readonly for i/o and memory.
> 
> Strict interpretation of spec requires that you write 0
> into reserved bits. These are bits 1 to 10 for ROM,
> and bit 1 for I/O.
> 
> 
Send patch with your favorite interpretation to qemu pcbios/seabios.
The regression concern from my previous mail applicable here as well.

--
                        Gleb.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]