[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv4 4/5] qemu/msi: missing braces
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv4 4/5] qemu/msi: missing braces |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:03:55 +0300 |
On 7/5/09, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:48:12PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 7/5/09, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > MSIX present bit is tested incorrectly, and only happens to work because
> > > the bit we are testing is 0x1. Add braces to fix this.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > hw/msix.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
> > > index 33549f5..db72cc3 100644
> > > --- a/hw/msix.c
> > > +++ b/hw/msix.c
> > > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void msix_load(PCIDevice *dev, QEMUFile *f)
> > > {
> > > unsigned n = dev->msix_entries_nr;
> > >
> > > - if (!dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX)
> > > + if (!(dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX))
> >
> > With the braces comment I meant that while working on the code, you
> > should update it to match CODING_STYLE:
> > if (!(dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX)) {
> > return;
> > }
>
>
> Yea ... it's probably better to do this all over the file, not piecewise,
> though. No?
I think it's better to do it together with other changes:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-05/msg00925.html