|
From: | Avi Kivity |
Subject: | Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2 |
Date: | Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:25:49 +0300 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) |
Avi Kivity wrote:
Paul Brook wrote:Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually impactssomething. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile if itintroduces extra complexity.If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the first place?Accuracy is much more important from my point of view. Also, the reduction in the number of signals delivered when the guest uses 100Hz is significant.
You'd also get better battery life on laptops. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |