[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastr

From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:25:49 +0300
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20070419)

Avi Kivity wrote:
Paul Brook wrote:
Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually impacts
something. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile if it
introduces extra complexity.

If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the first place?

Accuracy is much more important from my point of view. Also, the reduction in the number of signals delivered when the guest uses 100Hz is significant.

You'd also get better battery life on laptops.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]