[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastr

From: Paul Brook
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:57:19 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

> Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually impacts
> something.  Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile if it
> introduces extra complexity.

If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the first 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]