Re: [PATCH v2 04/22] sd: emmc: update OCR fields for eMMC

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 2/22/21 10:55 AM, Sai Pavan Boddu wrote:
> Hi Cedric
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 3:22 PM
>> To: Sai Pavan Boddu <saipava@xilinx.com>; Markus Armbruster
>> <armbru@redhat.com>; Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>; Max Reitz
>> <mreitz@redhat.com>; Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>> <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>; Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>; Joel Stanley
>> <joel@jms.id.au>; Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>; Dr. David Alan
>> Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>; Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>; Stefan
>> Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>; Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>;
>> Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>; Edgar Iglesias 
>> <edgari@xilinx.com>;
>> Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>; Paolo Bonzini
>> <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sai Pavan Boddu
>> <saipava@xilinx.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/22] sd: emmc: update OCR fields for eMMC
>>
>> On 2/22/21 9:20 AM, Sai Pavan Boddu wrote:
>>> From: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
>>>
>>> eMMC OCR register doesn't has UHS-II field and voltage fields are
>>> different.
>>
>> Can a patch be "From" a person without a "Signed-off-by" of the same person ?
> [Sai Pavan Boddu] No I should not be like this. My mistake, I would respin 
> the series with corrections. Few other patches may have this after the split 
> I did.

Please wait for more review before respining for this detail.