[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 8/9] hw/m68k: add a dummy SWIM f

From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 8/9] hw/m68k: add a dummy SWIM floppy controller
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:44:04 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

Le 09/09/2019 à 18:32, Aleksandar Markovic a écrit :
> 09.09.2019. 18.03, "Laurent Vivier" <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> је написао/ла:
>> Co-developed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
>> Reviewed-by: Hervé Poussineau <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
>> ---
> Laurent, hi!
> I am not sure how "Co-developed-by:" fits in our workflow. There was
> some recent talk on restricting those marks to only a handful of them,
> and preventing new ones from introducing (the starter example was
> something like "Regression-tested-by:"). Perhaps a final sentence "This
> patch was co-developed with Mark..." would be better?

"Co-developed-by:" is described in
linux/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst [1] whereas
"Regression-tested-by:" is not.

So as I'm not aware of the discussions you point out, are we in the same
situation here?


[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]