[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/10] hw/m68k: add Apple Machin

From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/10] hw/m68k: add Apple Machintosh Quadra 800 machine
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:55:19 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 2019-01-24 18:37, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 24/01/2019 17:15, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> On 24/01/2019 18:02, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 2018-11-02 16:22, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>>> (MCA: here's the latest version of the q800 patchset. I've hope that I've
>>>> addressed most of the comments, plus this will now boot into the Debian
>>>> installer correctly when applied to git master.
>>> Any update on this series? Why did it get stalled again?
>> I was thinking about this today.
>> Mark, perhaps you can send a rebased version of the series?
>> I think we need reviews for "esp: add pseudo-DMA as used by Macintosh".

I just gave it a quick review (see my separate mail) ... some few nits,
but all in all, it looks quite good to me.

> 1) Do we mind some of the more verbose comments that were taken from the Linux
> headers in some of the files? (I can also see that updates to the comment 
> checking in
> checkpatch.pl now cause the series to fail with style issues, so these will 
> need to
> be touched up regardless)

I personally would clean them up, but that's just a matter of taste. I
think that's nothing that should hold up this series. It can also be
done with a patch on top afterwards.

> 2) Do we need to add migration support for the ESP pseudo-DMA?

That would be cleaner, of course. But since the q800 likely can't be
migrated anyway, it's not that important. So if it is too much of a
hassle to add it, maybe simply add a comment next to the vmstate section
saying "/* TODO: Add migration support for the pdma data */" ?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]