[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/10] hw/m68k: add Apple Machin
From: |
Mark Cave-Ayland |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/10] hw/m68k: add Apple Machintosh Quadra 800 machine |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:37:59 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
On 24/01/2019 17:15, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> On 24/01/2019 18:02, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 2018-11-02 16:22, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> (MCA: here's the latest version of the q800 patchset. I've hope that I've
>>> addressed most of the comments, plus this will now boot into the Debian
>>> installer correctly when applied to git master.
>>
>> Any update on this series? Why did it get stalled again?
>>
>
> I was thinking about this today.
>
> Mark, perhaps you can send a rebased version of the series?
>
> I think we need reviews for "esp: add pseudo-DMA as used by Macintosh".
I've just done a quick rebase and push of my latest branch to
https://github.com/mcayland/qemu/tree/q800-dev-part1-mca and from what I can
tell it
still boots using the test command line in both graphic and -nographic mode.
Unfortuantely I have a lot less time this dev cycle than normal, so I'm going
to hand
this back over to Laurent for now while I focus back on SPARC/PPC. From my
notes the
outstanding things to look at are:
1) Do we mind some of the more verbose comments that were taken from the Linux
headers in some of the files? (I can also see that updates to the comment
checking in
checkpatch.pl now cause the series to fail with style issues, so these will
need to
be touched up regardless)
2) Do we need to add migration support for the ESP pseudo-DMA?
3) Is there a Linux test docker image available?
Other than these points I think the series is about good to go.
ATB,
Mark.