qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] blockdev: hold AioContext for


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] blockdev: hold AioContext for bdrv_unref() in external_snapshot_clean()
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:31:55 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:36:32AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/05/2017 04:41 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > bdrv_unref() requires the AioContext lock because bdrv_flush() uses
> > BDRV_POLL_WHILE(), which assumes the AioContext is currently held.  If
> > BDRV_POLL_WHILE() runs without AioContext held the
> > pthread_mutex_unlock() call in aio_context_release() fails.
> > 
> > This patch moves bdrv_unref() into the AioContext locked region to solve
> > the following pthread_mutex_unlock() failure:
> > 
> >   #0  0x00007f566181969b in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >   #1  0x00007f566181b3b1 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >   #2  0x00005592cd590458 in error_exit (err=<optimized out>, address@hidden 
> > <__func__.23977> "qemu_mutex_unlock") at util/qemu-thread-posix.c:36
> >   #3  0x00005592cd96e738 in qemu_mutex_unlock (address@hidden) at 
> > util/qemu-thread-posix.c:96
> >   #4  0x00005592cd969b69 in aio_context_release (address@hidden) at 
> > util/async.c:507
> >   #5  0x00005592cd8ead78 in bdrv_flush (address@hidden) at block/io.c:2478
> >   #6  0x00005592cd89df30 in bdrv_close (bs=0x5592cfa87210) at block.c:3207
> >   #7  0x00005592cd89df30 in bdrv_delete (bs=0x5592cfa87210) at block.c:3395
> >   #8  0x00005592cd89df30 in bdrv_unref (bs=0x5592cfa87210) at block.c:4418
> >   #9  0x00005592cd6b7f86 in qmp_transaction (dev_list=<optimized out>, 
> > has_props=<optimized out>, props=<optimized out>, address@hidden) at 
> > blockdev.c:2308
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  blockdev.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> 
> I know the series is too big/late for 2.11, but is this one patch worth
> having?

This fix is not critical for 2.11.  The bug shouldn't be triggered under
normal circumstances.

The bug was exposed while developing qemu-iotests 202, which uses
unconventional commands (blockdev-add to create BDSes with no -drive or
BlockBackend).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]