qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 05/16] hw/devices: Move Blizzard declarations into


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 05/16] hw/devices: Move Blizzard declarations into a new header
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 08:58:25 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1

On 1/7/19 7:39 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2019-01-04 18:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS                   |  1 +
>>  hw/arm/nseries.c              |  1 +
>>  hw/display/blizzard.c         |  2 +-
>>  include/hw/devices.h          |  7 -------
>>  include/hw/display/blizzard.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 include/hw/display/blizzard.h
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index dff4b98401..156ce9a698 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -640,6 +640,7 @@ M: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>>  L: address@hidden
>>  S: Odd Fixes
>>  F: hw/arm/nseries.c
>> +F: include/hw/display/blizzard.h
> 
> While you're at it, also add an entry for hw/display/blizzard.c here?

Good idea :)

> 
>>  Palm
>>  M: Andrzej Zaborowski <address@hidden>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/nseries.c b/hw/arm/nseries.c
>> index 906b7ca22d..9521be1cef 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/nseries.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/nseries.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>>  #include "hw/boards.h"
>>  #include "hw/i2c/i2c.h"
>>  #include "hw/devices.h"
>> +#include "hw/display/blizzard.h"
>>  #include "hw/block/flash.h"
>>  #include "hw/hw.h"
>>  #include "hw/bt.h"
>> diff --git a/hw/display/blizzard.c b/hw/display/blizzard.c
>> index 291abe6fca..471bd0ed99 100644
>> --- a/hw/display/blizzard.c
>> +++ b/hw/display/blizzard.c
>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>>  #include "qemu-common.h"
>>  #include "ui/console.h"
>> -#include "hw/devices.h"
>> +#include "hw/display/blizzard.h"
>>  #include "ui/pixel_ops.h"
>>  
>>  typedef void (*blizzard_fn_t)(uint8_t *, const uint8_t *, unsigned int);
>> diff --git a/include/hw/devices.h b/include/hw/devices.h
>> index 5ad134232c..25f895b330 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/devices.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/devices.h
>> @@ -28,13 +28,6 @@ void tsc2005_set_transform(void *opaque, 
>> MouseTransformInfo *info);
>>  /* stellaris_input.c */
>>  void stellaris_gamepad_init(int n, qemu_irq *irq, const int *keycode);
>>  
>> -/* blizzard.c */
>> -void *s1d13745_init(qemu_irq gpio_int);
>> -void s1d13745_write(void *opaque, int dc, uint16_t value);
>> -void s1d13745_write_block(void *opaque, int dc,
>> -                void *buf, size_t len, int pitch);
>> -uint16_t s1d13745_read(void *opaque, int dc);
>> -
>>  /* cbus.c */
>>  typedef struct {
>>      qemu_irq clk;
>> diff --git a/include/hw/display/blizzard.h b/include/hw/display/blizzard.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..8132557da1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/hw/display/blizzard.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Epson S1D13744/S1D13745 (Blizzard/Hailstorm/Tornado) LCD/TV controller.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2008 Nokia Corporation
>> + * Written by Andrzej Zaborowski <address@hidden>
> 
> I don't think that this e-mail address is still valid since that company
> has been bought up > 10 years ago... so it likely does not make sense to
> mention it in new files anymore. So just mention the name?

Sure, I had no idea.

TIL: check email domain when moving emails.

>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
>> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef HW_DISPLAY_BLIZZARD_H
>> +#define HW_DISPLAY_BLIZZARD_H
>> +
>> +#include "hw/irq.h"
>> +
>> +void *s1d13745_init(qemu_irq gpio_int);
>> +void s1d13745_write(void *opaque, int dc, uint16_t value);
>> +void s1d13745_write_block(void *opaque, int dc,
>> +                          void *buf, size_t len, int pitch);
>> +uint16_t s1d13745_read(void *opaque, int dc);
>> +
>> +#endif
>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>

Thanks!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]