[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Pyatcron-devel-list] Some comments on Brian code

From: Childers, Matthew
Subject: RE: [Pyatcron-devel-list] Some comments on Brian code
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:59:31 -0600

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julien Olivier [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:36 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Pyatcron-devel-list] Some comments on Brian code
> > Actually, they expect strings. My reasoning behind that was that
> > accepts ranges (e.g. 2-5), lists (e.g. 1,2,3), step values (e.g.
> > and so on. So, are we not going to have those kinds of
> > And what about the default value of '*'? If implemented as an
> > would we just use 0 for that?
> I guess it should be possible to "emulate" all that functionalities
> using string arrays, isn't it ?

That is a good point Brian.  I would imagine we would just need to
accept strings.  Not necessarily string arrays, since we should be able
to set all the options for a value with one string.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]