|
From: | Rob Malpass |
Subject: | FW: Regression output format |
Date: | Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:45:02 +0100 |
Hi all Did this get through to everyone (see below)? If so - no answers yet. As I say, if everyone's happy - that's fine - but thought I'd ask. Cheers Rob From: Rob Malpass [mailto:address@hidden Hi all This is not a criticism - just suggesting an improvement as I see it. If others are happy with the present situation - so be it. I've just been playing with linear regression in PSPP. While I'm content that the numbers look right, can I ask if everyone's happy with the format of the output? I confess I've not used SPSS for a regression for many a year but in PSPP I'm getting umpteen tables - seemingly 3 for each independent variable. What I (personally) would like to see is two tables when running a regression: 1) Overall model specifics: R Squared, F-Test on R, RESET test etc 2) For each independent variable, a table with the Coeff, the std err, the t-stat etc The second table above is very much the way Microfit does it and I (obviously) accept the point that we're trying to build an SPSS clone here so if PSPP is currently cloning the SPSS output so be it - but I thought I would float the idea. In my particular case, I have 10 independent variables such that I'm getting 30 tables i.e. 3 tables (coeff, ANOVA and std err) for each variable. This may be something to do with me running in a large font (on an Ubuntu 10.04 box) but I thought I would ask. For academic interest, I can easily supply the dataset I'm using if that would be helpful. The output I'm getting (to show just how many tables for 10 independent variables) is attached. Cheers Rob |
umpteen.txt
Description: Text document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |