[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## Re: p value for spearman's correlation

**From**: |
Ben Pfaff |

**Subject**: |
Re: p value for spearman's correlation |

**Date**: |
Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:00:00 -0800 |

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 3:23 AM John Darrington
<john@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote:
>
>* On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 07:58:40PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:*
>* Alternatively, I wouldn't be upset if PSPP refuses to print any p-value*
>* for N < 30. I think ideally we would add a keyword requesting a more*
>* advanced algorithm.*
>
>* I think this is probably the best course of action at least in the short*
>* term.*
If not printing a p-value for this case is likely to confuse others, perhaps the
procedure should add a footnote indicating why the p-value is not output.

**p value for spearman's correlation**, *Ramagokula Krishnan*, `2020/12/26`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *John Darrington*, `2020/12/26`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *Alan Mead*, `2020/12/26`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *Ben Pfaff*, `2020/12/26`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *Alan Mead*, `2020/12/26`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *John Darrington*, `2020/12/26`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *Alan Mead*, `2020/12/26`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *Alex Ernesto Davila Davila*, `2020/12/26`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *Alan Mead*, `2020/12/27`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *John Darrington*, `2020/12/27`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**,
*Ben Pfaff* **<=**
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *Alan Mead*, `2020/12/27`
**Re: p value for spearman's correlation**, *Alex Ernesto Davila Davila*, `2020/12/27`