[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence
From: |
jemarch |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:49:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
> Poppler is a major technical obstacle towards the adoption of (L)GPLv3
> (by "technical" I mean when the copyright holders wish to use the new
> licenses, but they cannot for compatibility issues because of the
> libraries they use). I'd wish it was the only one, but it's not.
It's not the only issue no, but we're open to relicensing Ghostscript
GPLv2+ if it would be useful to the community. We've not done so yet,
but gnupdf isn't the only way of resolving this particular "technical"
barrier.
That would be great! A GPLv2+ ghostscript would be really useful. We
could reuse a lot of code for gnupdf, for instance, and I am sure a
lot more projects would benefit from a GPLv3 gs.
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, (continued)
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Martin Schröder, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Martin Schröder, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Brad Hards, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Ralph Giles, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence,
jemarch <=
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, Vincent Torri, 2009/01/09