[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence
From: |
Ralph Giles |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:08:35 -0800 |
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Yavor Doganov <address@hidden> wrote:
> Poppler is a major technical obstacle towards the adoption of (L)GPLv3
> (by "technical" I mean when the copyright holders wish to use the new
> licenses, but they cannot for compatibility issues because of the
> libraries they use). I'd wish it was the only one, but it's not.
It's not the only issue no, but we're open to relicensing Ghostscript
GPLv2+ if it would be useful to the community. We've not done so yet,
but gnupdf isn't the only way of resolving this particular "technical"
barrier.
-r
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, (continued)
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Martin Schröder, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Martin Schröder, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Brad Hards, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence,
Ralph Giles <=
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, Vincent Torri, 2009/01/09