[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases
From: |
jemarch |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:55:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.60 (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
> would protect the function for a single case of invalid pointer. But
> as I mentioned early in C there is not a way (AFAIK) to determine if a
> pointer is valid or invalid. So you are covering the case list == NULL
> but not list == 24 (that is likely to be an invalid address) neither
> list == 25 or list == 1.
I agree, but my philosophy is, if you can test at least for one
invalid case, just do it. :-)
I agre in that to check for `list == NULL' increases the robustness of
the code. Anyway, if it is the case then the function documentation
should explicitly say that if the address of the X parameter is NULL
then PDF_EBADDATA is returned in the pdf_status variable.
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, (continued)
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, anish patil, 2008/04/17
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, jemarch, 2008/04/17
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, gerel, 2008/04/17
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, gerel, 2008/04/17
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, jemarch, 2008/04/18
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, gerel, 2008/04/18
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, gerel, 2008/04/18
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, jemarch, 2008/04/19
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, jemarch, 2008/04/19
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, gerel, 2008/04/19
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases,
jemarch <=
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, Eder, 2008/04/20
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, Eder, 2008/04/20
- pdf_XXX_t variables creation (Was: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases), jemarch, 2008/04/20
- Re: pdf_XXX_t variables creation (Was: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases), Eder, 2008/04/21
- Re: pdf_XXX_t variables creation (Was: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases), gerel, 2008/04/21
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, anish patil, 2008/04/25
- Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, jemarch, 2008/04/28
Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases, jemarch, 2008/04/07