[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Which AHRS implementation for Fixedwings?

From: Felix Ruess
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Which AHRS implementation for Fixedwings?
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:57:11 +0100

Hi Tilman,

I added some info about float_dcm to the wiki page... that is definitely usable.

For some of the others I added the centrifugal force correction to the
dev branch but couldn't test this in flight so far.
So testers for this are very welcome!

Cheers, Felix

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Tilman Baumann <address@hidden> wrote:
> This Wiki site seems to
> indicate that all AHRS implementation are actually "not recommended for
> fixedwings".
> Is this still current? And which implementation is recommended for
> fixedwings if any? Do I need a self contained AHRS subsystem (hardware)?
> And what would be the pros and cons of using internal or external AHRS?
> Thanks
>  Tilman
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]