Re: [Pan-users] Re: pan-0.119 issue

[walt]

Duncan wrote:
...
> FWIW, I returned to glibc-2.4-r4 (had to hack portage to get it to do it
> since the package has a safety feature preventing downgrades, and my
> non-pan issue is gone, as I expected it would be from an earlier test. 
> I'm not sure about the pan crashes as they were rather less frequent and
> thus harder to duplicate, but so far, so good. =8^)...

I'm afraid I'm seeing the same pan problem with glibc-2.4-r4, but it's
rare, so I'm at a loss to trigger it on purpose.  I guess running pan
from gdb every time might catch it.