openexr-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Openexr-devel] Writing Deep tiled images: help !


From: Peter Hillman
Subject: Re: [Openexr-devel] Writing Deep tiled images: help !
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:54:40 +1200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

In general with OpenEXR, you cannot write to a file from different threads unless they have a shared framebuffer. Calling "setFrameBuffer" from one thread while another is writing may cause a crash.

Even if you do have a shared framebuffer, the threads lock to serialise the writes: only one "writePixels" or "writeTile" request goes through at once. If you don't use the IlmThread library to run your threads it may be wise to implement your own lock mechanism around writePixel and writeTile calls.


There are two ways of writing tiled data: if you use xTileCoords/yTileCoords, then pixel(0,0) is the bottom left corner of each tile, implying the image buffer pointed to by the slice is the same size as the tile. if you don't do that, then pixel(0,0) is the bottom left corner of the displayWindow, implying the image buffer pointed to be the slice is the size of the dataWindow, accounting for offset data windows appropriately.

In your case, it would seem like you want the second option: preallocate your dataWindow sized array of pointers-to-samples, and call setFrameBuffer before any rendering begins. Then each thread sets the pointers to the samples for the tile it is going to write and fills in the corresponding part of the samplecount array before calling writeTile.

The pointers need not be valid when setFrameBuffer is called. When you call writeTile, only the pointers and sampleCount data for the pixels being written need to be valid, and need not remain valid afterwards. So yes, you can delete data for the actual sample data of a tile after calling writeTile, though you'll need to keep the sampleCount array and the pointers-to-samples array for each channel.

Note that if you are writing tiles in anything other than RANDOM_Y order, then whenever your threads deliver tiles out of order OpenEXR will have to buffer data so it can write the tiles sequentially. I suspect this may well be the case from multithreaded write applications. With deep data this could take a significant amount of memory. You may wish to enforce RANDOM_Y order to allow the library to write tiles to disk as soon as you call writeTile. If your read pattern is generally also random, rather than in 'scanline order', there'll be little performance hit.

You might also consider having one worker thread managing the writing of tile data and marshalling into the format required for the DeepSlices, and have other threads compute data and signal the worker thread when they have tiles ready for processing.

Yes, you can use an Array2D<float*> for your data points (dataZ and dataA in the example). Each value is a pointer to the first sample of the channel data for each pixel. Subsequent samples are found using the offset provided. That means you can store pixel data in separate or interleaved channels.



On 11/04/14 02:16, Michel Lerenard wrote:
Hi,

I'm trying to write deep data into an EXR file and am having trouble understanding how the API works. I'd like to be able to write tiles from different threads. The application I'm working on (Isotropix Clarisse) runs several threads, each one render a part of an image.
I'd like to write deep data when the current tile is completely computed.

I'm using the "Reading And Writing Image Files" documentation, and the section about Deep Tile File writing on page 26 is confusing to me.

From what I understand, I need a DeepFrameBuffer to write an image. It seems it should be the same for all threads, as a DeepTiledOutputFile can only use one. Is it thread safe ? Can I use the same FrameBuffer from all threads ? I was puzzled by the type of dataZ and data0, reading the next example (reading a deep tiled file) I understand that the arrays are only storing pointers to deep data for a particular pixel, and that they could as well be Array2D<float*>. Is that correct ?

If it is, this means that each one of my threads should set pointers in the framebuffer DeepSlice for each pixel of the tile it's computing, then call writeTile. After that can I delete the data and reset the pointers in the DeepSlice ?


Thanks,

Michel


_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]