[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9924] Suggestion for a memory() function

From: Markus Mützel
Subject: [Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9924] Suggestion for a memory() function
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 06:02:47 -0400 (EDT)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0

Follow-up Comment #25, patch #9924 (project octave):

I moved reading the pseudo files on Linux to a local function and removed some
variables that are no longer used in patch9924_memory_v2.patch. It still
applies on top of patch9924_wmemory.patch.

Additionally, I added some documentation in patch9924_memory_doc.patch. I am
not sure I used the correct terminology and what I wrote makes at least have
sense. A review and corrections would be very welcome.
I hope to also have covered the potential issue Lars mentioned in comment #23

There is no "Ready to Review" status on the patch tracker. So I'll leave the
status on "In Progress". Although I think most of the work should be finished
that is necessary for an initial push to the repository.

(file #49159, file #49160)

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: patch9924_memory_v2.patch      Size:9 KB

File name: patch9924_memory_doc.patch     Size:2 KB


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]