[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9924] Suggestion for a memory() function

[Markus Mützel]

Update of patch #9924 (project octave):

                  Status:                    None => In Progress            

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #22:

I went ahead and removed the linux tag, adapted the code to the coding
standards, added calling the __wmemory__ function on Windows and created a
patch with Lars as the author.
It applies on top of the wmemory patch.

I also added a fallback to MemFree if MemAvailable doesn't exist in 
proc/meminfo. Is this ok? Or is there something better we can do?

We should probably flesh out the documentation a little bit more, i.e. explain
the meaning of the fields in the returned structures.

Querying the actual size of the user address space on Linux as well as support
on Mac would be nice. But that could also be added at a later point imho.


(file #49140)
    _______________________________________________________

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: patch9924_memory.patch         Size:9 KB
    <https://savannah.gnu.org/file/patch9924_memory.patch?file_id=49140>



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?9924>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/