[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:04:06 -0700 |
On 06/26/2018 10:34 AM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 06/26/2018 12:08 PM, Rik wrote:
>
>> Using 'grep -r octave.mk *' in the mxe directory I see that configure.ac,
>> index.html, and dist-files.mk mention that file. It is easy enough to
>> remove octave.mk from dist-files.mk and index.html, and to update
>> configure.ac to use default-octave.mk.
>>
>> I ran 'make clean' and 'autoconf' and am now testing whether I can do a
>> full build.
>
> The mxe-octave makefile is really complicated and does lots of
> transformations on variables so unfortunately grep won't find
> everything. And then there are some conventions that are not immediately
> obvious.
>
> I checked in the following change to remove the "octave" package:
>
> http://hg.octave.org/mxe-octave/rev/9942a9c37ffe
>
> If I remember correctly, later versions of mxe (not mxe-octave) don't
> rely on the index.html file to indicate which packages (and src/PKG.mk
> files) are part of the collection.
This looks right now. I'm building, but it will be a while before I know
for sure.
--Rik
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, (continued)
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, Markus Mützel, 2018/06/26
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, John W. Eaton, 2018/06/26
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, Rik, 2018/06/26
- Aw: Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, Markus Mützel, 2018/06/26
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, John W. Eaton, 2018/06/26
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, Rik, 2018/06/26
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, John W. Eaton, 2018/06/26
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?, John W. Eaton, 2018/06/26
- Re: octave.mk MXE file still necessary?,
Rik <=