RE: MXE-Octave & release candidates

[PhilipNienhuis]

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Nienhuis [mailto:address@hidden 

> John Donoghue wrote:
>>
>>> Message: 8
>>> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:19:44 -0800 (PST)
>>> From: PhilipNienhuis<

> pr.nienhuis@

> >
> 
> Did you push the changes?
> 
> If so I'll pull and give it a try tonight.
> 
> Usually with updates of dependencies I have to carefully clean up the
> MXE-tree - starting over from scratch is a very time-consuming affair. 
> Especially for small packages this gets out of balance - like 4 hrs
> building
> of a complete mxe-octave where the updated package in question builds
> within
> a minute.
> Luckily llvm didn't get compiled at all here yet, so that will be no
> problem. With gnuplot it may be different.
> 
> Philip
> ---
> 
> I pushed yesterday.
> 
> Gnuplot is a standalone application so should be quick to build it.

(cross-building right now)
Not only gnuplot: I see build-m4, build-autoconf, build-automake, lapack,
arpack, gettext, gnutils, libidn, curl, gl2ps, gnuplot.... (llvm yet to
come) - I'm sure I pulled & updated maybe three days ago or so.

Perusing the log I see that you pushed a cset so that gl2ps.dll gets
properly included in natively mxe-octave built installers.
Just to let you know that with my cross-builds gl2ps.dll didn't get included
either. I think I reported that a few day ago.

Philip




--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Re-MXE-Octave-release-candidates-tp4658781p4658865.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.