|
| From: | Michael Leitner |
| Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61300] primes() is 4 times slower for integer types than for double, patch attached |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:17:35 -0400 (EDT) |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #61300 (project octave):
Yes, this is a regression, on version 6.0.1 (via octave-online.net) I have
++
format long;n = uint64(1.5e9), lenp = floor((n+1)/6), a=(8:7:lenp)(end-4:end)
n = 1500000000
lenp = 250000000
a =
249999968 249999975 249999982 249999989 249999996
--
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61300>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |