[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61300] primes() is 4 times slower for integer types than for double, patch attached

[Michael Leitner]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #61300 (project octave):

Wasn't there some recent work by jwe on integer ranges? Because without the
patch, if you call primes with an integer class input, this ends up as the
upper end of a range that is used for indexing, which perhaps is slow. But why
it would be so very slow I do not see.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61300>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/