[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60527] Warnings during compilation and test errors with gcc 11

[Michael Godfrey]

Follow-up Comment #20, bug #60527 (project octave):

Good news. I removed all the java related entries from the fc34
system 


and then went to: https://jdk.java.net/16/
and downloaded Linux / x64      tar.gz (sha256)

Then installed the required files and recompiled.
dnf install java-latest-openjdk.x86_64
dnf install java-latest-openjdk-devel.x86_64
dnf install java-11-openjdk-devel.x86_64
This produced for :rpm -qa|grep java

tzdata-java-2021a-1.fc34.noarch
python3-javapackages-5.3.0-15.fc34.noarch
abrt-java-connector-1.2.0-5.fc34.x86_64
javapackages-filesystem-5.3.0-15.fc34.noarch
java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.11.0.9-0.fc34.x86_64
java-11-openjdk-11.0.11.0.9-0.fc34.x86_64
javapackages-tools-5.3.0-15.fc34.noarch
javacc-7.0.4-8.fc34.noarch
java-latest-openjdk-headless-16.0.1.0.9-1.rolling.fc34.x86_64
java-latest-openjdk-16.0.1.0.9-1.rolling.fc34.x86_64
java-latest-openjdk-devel-16.0.1.0.9-1.rolling.fc34.x86_64
java-11-openjdk-devel-11.0.11.0.9-0.fc34.x86_64


make check:
 This
produced:
  PASS                            16771
  FAIL                                0
  XFAIL (reported bug)               28
  SKIP (missing feature)            126
  SKIP (run-time condition)          20

My fc32 system gives:
  PASS                            16772
  FAIL                                0
  XFAIL (reported bug)               27
  SKIP (missing feature)            126
  SKIP (run-time condition)          20

Just one failure to resolve. So, it appears that the java
in the fc34 release is not useful. The recommendation to go to
the java source above is clearly better.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60527>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/