[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7
From: |
Laura Creighton |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7 |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Sep 2016 20:52:57 +0200 |
In a message of Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:57:19 -0400, David Levine writes:
>How about this, in nmh(7) and the output from install-mh(1):
>
>BUGS
> Send bug reports, questions, suggestions, and patches to nmh-
> address@hidden That mailing list is relatively quiet, so user
> questions are encouraged. Users are also encouraged to subscribe.
>
> If problems are encountered with an nmh program, they should be
> reported to the local maintainers of nmh, if any, or to the mailing
> list noted above. When doing this, the name of the program should be
> reported, along with the version information for the program.
>
> To find out what version of an nmh program is being run, invoke the
> program with the -version switch. This prints the version of nmh, the
> host it was compiled on, and the date the program was linked.
>
> New releases and other information of potential interest are announced
> at http://www.nongnu.org/nmh/ .
This looks good to me.
>> This is one place where I would like a link to documentation, at some
>> master site, (so you can read it even if the docs never made it to
>> where they are supposed to be for your distro.)
>
>Unfortunately, there isn't such a site. If the man pages didn't get
>installed, that's a packaging problem. Modern nmh should be easier for
>packagers to deal with than older versions.
Ah, I was talking about the case where there is a man page, but no
user documentation. Lots of places I go don't install the documentation
everywhere, just some places.
If we have a git page, and this for browsing the source
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/nmh.git
then we ought to find it easy to make the docs as git-browsable as
the code, no?
Laura
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, David Levine, 2016/09/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/09/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Paul Fox, 2016/09/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, David Levine, 2016/09/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Paul Fox, 2016/09/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Laura Creighton, 2016/09/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Paul Fox, 2016/09/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, David Levine, 2016/09/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/09/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/09/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7,
Laura Creighton <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, David Levine, 2016/09/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/09/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Paul Fox, 2016/09/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/09/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Paul Vixie, 2016/09/26
- [Nmh-workers] document formatting (here we go ...), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/09/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/09/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Ken Hornstein, 2016/09/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Anthony J. Bentley, 2016/09/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7, Paul Fox, 2016/09/28