[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] base64 ... just looking for advice
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] base64 ... just looking for advice |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:13:42 -0600 |
Wolfgang wrote:
> And I feel that parsing and modifying the actual content
> of the message parts is something that should NOT be done.
> OTOH, we might always have such a problem. We cannot know if even
> a text/plain part comes in some internal format that includes
> information about the used character set. So converting is always
> a somewhat risky operation.
>
> It depends on the user - speaking for myself only, I would happily
> accept this risk for text/plain parts, as the number of cases where
> this is really helpful is huge compared to ny theoretical pitfalls;
> for text/html I hesitate, as the very first example I ran into shows
> such a problem.
It seems that we're in complete agreement, with the possible exception
of not wanting to decode encoded non-text/plain parts while still
decoding text/plain parts. mhfixmsg -decodetext is not selective:
it decodes each encoded part. We had (briefly) discussed this here a
while back. I don't think it's worth the added complexity of an
interface that would allow selective decoding. (And I always want to
decode base64.)
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] base64 ... just looking for advice, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] base64 ... just looking for advice, David Levine, 2016/01/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] base64 ... just looking for advice, David Levine, 2016/01/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] base64 ... just looking for advice, David Levine, 2016/01/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] base64 ... just looking for advice, David Levine, 2016/01/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] base64 ... just looking for advice, Wolfgang Denk, 2016/01/23