Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi,

Lyndon wrote:
> What Jon meant was "don't crash when your code encounters garbage
> input," and was written in the context of the IMPs tipping over when
> receiving invalid packets.  It *never* meant "second guess the
> sender's intent and patch accordingly."

Right.  And ISTM an even worse idea to attempt that in today's world of
folks trying to exploit flaws.  If they can't follow our RFCs, we don't
want their emails!  ;-)

Cheers, Ralph.