[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] dot locking broken?
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] dot locking broken? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:02:35 -0500 |
>Which actually lead me to another thought: maybe we should
>at least _respect_ dot lock (i.e. do not allow writing to a dotlocked
>file) but create dot lock only if that particular locking is
>requested.
That might be a bit architecturally hard. Personally, I am not sure about
doing that; the locking code is already pretty complicated (witness the bugs
you found) and I am reluctant to add more complexity. Since the locking
can be configured at runtime, it's easy for a user to fix it if it is wrong.
--Ken
Re: [Nmh-workers] dot locking broken?, Marcin Cieslak, 2015/02/13
Re: [Nmh-workers] dot locking broken?, David Levine, 2015/02/11