[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks |
Date: |
Fri, 16 May 2014 09:47:17 -0400 |
> >I still like the idea of including a simple built-in formatter. I will
> >go play with htmlfmt and see just how much work it will be to port it.
>
> I'm fine with either of these options. If we include htmlfmt,
In general, I'm not fond of including third-party code.
It's a support and maintenance headache. In this particular
case, I just don't think it's necessary. We should already
handle html well, and wrapper scripts could make that even
better.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, Paul Fox, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, Paul Fox, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, norm, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/16
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks, David Levine, 2014/05/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks,
David Levine <=