[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow
From: |
Oliver Kiddle |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 23:18:15 +0100 |
Ken Hornstein wrote:
> Err ... that _would_ work with the proposed scheme, right? I mean, assuming
> you had a profile entry that used w3m to convert the HTML to text, this
> would continue to work. So I'm unclear why we need two mechanisms.
Yes, it continues to work. I should probably just think about better
ways to script around it.
> I'm trying to understand why you wouldn't want to show all text parts.
> It seems like 90%+ of the emails I get have a text part (either plain or
> HTML) as the first item, then non-text content afterwards.
Where later parts are text, they are often intended as attachments: XML
files, patches etc. I know I tried using "-type text" and I may have
forgotten all the reasons for not keeping it.
Oliver
- [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Oliver Kiddle, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Paul Fox, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07