[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:54:22 -0400 |
>is "make check" the only way to invoke the tests? i couldn't see
>an easy way to invoke just one.
As David pointed out, a lot of the tests can be invoked directly, but you
_can_ use make to invoke just one test. Just set the TESTS argument as
part of "make check". Well, you probably want to run the cleanup test
as well. E.g.:
% make check TESTS="test/inc/test-inc-scanout test/cleanup"
>(and, for some reason the slocal test always fails for me. different topic.)
Errr ... it's not a dbm problem, is it? :-) If you post the output to that
test we'd be glad to take a look at it.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/02
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, David Levine, 2013/04/17
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, David Levine, 2013/04/18