[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:14:15 -0400 |
>i've implemented and tested the relative message selection code
>as i described it earlier. thanks to all who contributed to the
>design.
Paul,
I think it looks great; thanks for your hard work on this!
If you don't mind ... could you make sure that your work includes the
appropriate changes to the man pages, the pending-release-notes file,
and if you feel up to it, maybe some tests? If you have questions about
how the test suite works, please speak up ... I think David and I should
be able to answer them (Josh Bressers did the original work on the test
suite, but I don't know if he's kept up with the changes to it in the past
few releases).
--Ken
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/02
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, David Levine, 2013/04/17
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, David Levine, 2013/04/18