[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences)
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences) |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:44:36 -0500 |
Ken wrote:
> Yeah, but until (relatively) recently, that could result
> in corrupted sequences. I'm just trying to imagine how
> people could be doing that since it can break, today.
They live with it, I suppose. I don't rely on sequences
for anything important.
(And shouldn't that be "now" instead of "until (relatively)
recently"?)
> - If you're going to MODIFY the sequence file (which ends
> up being a large number of programs, actually), it needs
> to be write-locked the whole time you're fiddling with
> it.
That sounds like a problem to me. Could an inc have to
wait a half hour for a refile/folder -pack/or any of a
large number of other operations to finish?
David
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), David Levine, 2013/03/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), David Levine, 2013/03/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), David Levine, 2013/03/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences),
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), chad, 2013/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Paul Vixie, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Paul Vixie, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Paul Vixie, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/03/11